By Topic

A chord stenograph keyboard: a possible solution to the learning problem in stenography

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
M. P. Beddoes ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., British Columbia Univ., Vancouver, BC, Canada ; Zhongzhi Hu

This paper shows that the chord principle, used to couple chords one-to-one with phonemes, can be applied to the design of a new and powerful keyboard for the stenograph. The new keyboard is called the minimum chord stenograph (MCS). The training time is quite short. Within the limits imposed by no more than 50 hours' training, MCS' input data rates are superior to those from the old stenograph. One can definitely state that MCS requires a modest time to learn the code and, in return, gives a means for rapid entry of phoneme-based speech. A review is given of relevant features of the standard typewriter (QWERTY), chord keyboards, and the normal stenograph. Detailed insight into the operator-and-machine as a unit is provided by interval measurements t p(r) taken directly from tests when MCS is being operated. t p(r) is the time measured from the end of one chord and the end of the next chord r. A pseudochannel capacity Cp(r) is used to show that MCS' performance gets better as training time is increased. Although QWERTY works with alphabet letters as input and MCS works with phonemes as input an attempt is made to compare QWERTY and MCS in terms of “words per minute”. The two methods are not very different in time to acquire a first competence, but MCS's top speed after 50 hours of training is a little better than QWERTY's speed for operators all of whom had at least a year of training and usage

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics  (Volume:24 ,  Issue: 7 )