By Topic

The influence of various common assumptions on the boundary-condition-independence of compact thermal models

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
C. J. M. Lasance ; Philips Res. Labs., Eindhoven, Netherlands

It has been repeatedly shown that high accuracy can be obtained when comparing boundary-condition-independent compact thermal models (CTMs) to detailed model results. However, it should be realized that these results have been generated using certain assumptions (e.g., uniformly distributed boundary conditions), and the question remains about the validity of these assumptions when CTMs are used in "real-life" environments. The results show that the assumptions are justified, at least for the package studied, with the exception of boundary conditions associated with heat spreaders and heat sinks. For this type of boundary condition, we need to specify separate heat transfer coefficients for the two nodes at the surface. Finally, an important conclusion is that the "traditionally" generated CTMs perform very well in "real-life" environments.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies  (Volume:27 ,  Issue: 3 )