By Topic

Evaluating the Imagine stream architecture

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Jung Ho Ahn ; Comput. Sci. Lab., Stanford Univ., CA, USA ; W. J. Dally ; B. Khailany ; U. J. Kapasi
more authors

This paper describes an experimental evaluation of the prototype Imagine stream processor. Imagine (Kapasi et al., 2002) is a stream processor that employs a two-level register hierarchy with 9.7 Kbytes of local register file capacity and 128 Kbytes of stream register file (SRF) capacity to capture producer-consumer locality in stream applications. Parallelism is exploited using an array of 48 floating-point arithmetic units organized as eight SIMD clusters with a 6-wide VLIW per cluster. We evaluate the performance of each aspect of the Imagine architecture using a set of synthetic micro-benchmarks, key media processing kernels, and full applications. These micro-benchmarks show that the prototype hardware can attain 7.96 GFLOPS or 25.4 GOPS of arithmetic performance, 12.7 Gbytes/s of SRF bandwidth, 1.58 Gbytes/s of memory system bandwidth, and accept up to 2 million stream processor instructions per second from a host processor. On a set of media processing kernels, Imagine sustained an average of 43% of peak arithmetic performance. An evaluation of full applications provides a breakdown of where execution time is spent. Over full applications, Imagine achieves 39.4% of peak performance, of the remainder on average 36.4% of time is lost due to load imbalance between arithmetic units in the VLIW clusters and limited instruction-level parallelism within kernel inner loops, 10.6% is due to kernel startup and shutdown overhead because of short stream lengths, 7.6% is due to memory stalls, and the rest is due to insufficient host processor bandwidth. Further analysis included in the paper presents the impact of host instruction bandwidth on application performance, particularly on smaller datasets. In summary, the experimental measurements described in this paper demonstrate the high performance and efficiency of stream processing: operating at 200 MHz, Imagine sustains 4.81 GFLOPS on QR decomposition while dissipating 7.42 Watts.

Published in:

Computer Architecture, 2004. Proceedings. 31st Annual International Symposium on

Date of Conference:

19-23 June 2004