By Topic

Binocular versus trinocular stereo

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
U. R. Dhond ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Texas Univ., Austin, TX, USA ; J. K. Aggarwal

Consideration is given to the twin issues of the gain in accuracy of stereo correspondence and the accompanying increase in computational cost due to the use of a third camera for stereo analysis. The relative performance of binocular and trinocular stereo algorithms on stereo images with known ground truth is evaluated. A technology for comparing the matching performance of stereo algorithms by using real digital elevation maps is developed. Trinocular local matching reduces the percentage of mismatches having large disparity errors by more than one half when compared to binocular matching, while trinocular stereopsis increases the computational cost of local matching over binocular stereopsis by only about one fourth

Published in:

Robotics and Automation, 1990. Proceedings., 1990 IEEE International Conference on

Date of Conference:

13-18 May 1990