By Topic

Debunking the Learning Curve

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
C. Goddard ; Bell Lab, PA, USA

The learning curve relates manufacturing cost to cumulative production. It is shown that for every well-behaved learning curve there is a corresponding relationship between unit cost and the annual rate of production. Cause and effect are assignable to this new function which is dubbed the opportunity curve. The growth in annual demand creates opportunities and provides the funds for increased mechanization and larger batch facilities in process dominated manufacture. In the absence of growth, both are seriously curtailed. The concept of the opportunity curve is developed from available data related to the U.S. integrated circuit industry. The opportunity curve in combination with the warranted growth curve permits an analysis of corporate strategies which remain obscure in interpretations of the learning curve. Reductions in cost are enhanced by growth, and a firm which holds a very significant share of the market--either across the board or in a segregated sector of the technology--will have a cost advantage. There is nothing wrong with the learning curve. But in combining annual production and time in the single variable, cumulative production, it hides more than it reveals.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology  (Volume:5 ,  Issue: 4 )