By Topic

An Anarchy of Methods: Current Trends in How Intelligence Is Abstracted in AI

Sign In

Full text access may be available.

To access full text, please use your member or institutional sign in.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
J. Lehman ; The University of Texas at Austin ; J. Clune ; S. Risi

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a sprawling field encompassing a diversity of approaches to machine intelligence and disparate perspectives on how intelligence should be viewed. Because researchers often engage only within their own specialized area of AI, there are many interesting broad questions about AI as a whole that often go unanswered. How should intelligence be abstracted in AI research? Which subfields, techniques, and abstractions are most promising? Why do researchers bet their careers on the particular abstractions and techniques of their chosen subfield of AI? Should AI research be "bio-inspired" and remain faithful to the process that produced intelligence (evolution) or the biological substrate that enables it (networks of neurons)? Discussing these big-picture questions motivated us to organize an AAAI Fall Symposium, which gathered participants across AI subfields to present and debate their views. This article distills the resulting insights.

Published in:

IEEE Intelligent Systems  (Volume:29 ,  Issue: 6 )