1. Introduction
Acommon issue in the inverse-scattering community is a lack of experimental scattering data. Experimental data is required to prove that imaging algorithms, which are typically first tested on synthetic data, will provide useful images in the real world. Databases such as the Ipswich (e.g., [1]–[4]) and Fresnel (e.g., [5]–[7]) databases have partially addressed this insufficiency. The Ipswich and Fresnel data were collected with a bistatic, mechanically scanned system, with antennas located in the far field. However, there are many applications, such as biomedical imaging or nondestructive testing, for which scattering data are better collected with a mechanically static near-field system. Advantages of near-field imaging include higher resolution [8],[9], but additional complications such as antenna coupling and a complicated incident field do occur. We are aware of one repository of near-field multi-static data [10], but this dataset is available pre-calibrated, with closely coupled antennas removed, and at a single frequency.