A Comparison of the Performance of Different Multiline Transmit Setups for Fast Volumetric Cardiac Ultrasound

It was previously demonstrated in 2-D echocardiography that a proper multiline transmit (MLT) implementation can be used to increase frame rate while preserving image quality. Initial findings for extending MLT to 3-D showed that it might address the low spatiotemporal resolution of current volumetric ultrasound systems. However, to date, it remains unclear how much transmit/receive parallelization would be possible using a 3-D MLT system. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to contrast different MLT setups for 3-D imaging by computer simulation in order to determine an optimal tradeoff between the amount of parallelization of an MLT system and the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting images. Hereto, the image quality of several MLT setups was estimated by quantifying their crosstalk energy level. The results showed that for the tested setups, 4MLT broad beams and 9MLT narrow beams with Tukey (
$\alpha = 0.5$
) apodization in transmit and receive give the highest frame rate gain while maintaining an acceptable interbeam interference level. Moreover, although 16MLT narrow beams with Tukey/Tukey (
$\alpha = 0.5$
) apodization did show more pronounced interbeam interference, its gain in frame rate might outweigh its predicted loss in image quality. As such both 9MLT and 16MLT narrow beams were tested experimentally. For both systems, four receive lines were reconstructed from each transmit beam. The contrast-to-noise ratio of these imaging strategies was quantified and compared with the image quality obtained with line-by-line scanning. Despite some expected loss in image quality, the resulting images of the parallelized systems were very competitive to the benchmark, while speeding up the acquisition process by a factor of 36 and 64, respectively.