IEEE Xplore At-A-Glance
  • Abstract

Maximizing the Force Between Two Cuboid Magnets

Recently, we wrote that to maximize the force between two magnets of fixed volume, the magnet dimensions should be chosen to be as thin as possible in the direction of magnetization. This was incorrect, and we clarify this point.

In a recent paper (Robertson 2010), we wrote that for a constant volume of magnetic material, a greater facing area yields greater forces; unfortunately, Fig. 1 in that publication was incorrect, and this lead us to an invalid conclusion on this point.

Figure 1
Fig. 1. Schematic of the magnetic spring. The magnets have square facing sides and extend a distance of b in the direction toward the reader. When x = 0, the magnet faces are touching.

Consider the basic magnetic spring shown in Fig. 1, consisting of two magnets separated by a displacement, x (measured between the near faces), and generating a repulsive force, F, between them. The magnets have square facing sides, a height-to-width ratio of γ = a/b, and a fixed volume V; the height of each magnet is Formula and the face size width (and length into the page) is Formula.

The magnetic forces between the magnets can be calculated by applying the theory of Akoun and Yonnet (1984), where the force F = Fm(V,γ,x) is a function of magnet volume V, size ratio γ, and displacement x.

Such forces were calculated between these magnets for a magnet volume V = 10 mm3 over a displacement x from 0 to 10 mm and a magnet size ratio γ from 0.1 to 1. Note that the forces were calculated with a magnetization of 1 T for both magnets, essentially normalizing the output forces by the magnetization strength. The MATLAB code used to calculate these results is located in the script examples/mag_ratio.m in the code repository http://github.com/wspr/magcode.

In order to compare the force versus displacement characteristics for a range of magnet size ratios, we will normalize the forces by the force Fs = Fm(V,1,x), i.e., the force for a magnet size ratio γ = 1. Figs. 2 and 3 show the normalized force Formula as a function of displacement x over a range of magnet size ratios γ. The figures are drawn as separate graphs in order to avoid overlap of the curves; size ratio γ varies from 0 to 0.4 in Fig. 2 and from 0.4 to 0.8 in Fig. 3. It can be seen from the two graphs that a magnet size ratio γ of around 0.4 produces the greatest forces, for values both less and greater than 0.4, the normalized force curves decrease.

Figure 2
Fig. 2. Normalized force Formula as a function of displacement x for a set of magnet ratios γ = {0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4}.
Figure 3
Fig. 3. Normalized force Formula as a function of displacement x for a set of magnet ratios γ = {0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8}.

Some small overlap in the force curves for γ = 0.4 and γ = 0.5 is seen in Fig. 3. This indicates that the optimum magnet size ratio (to maximize the force) is dependent on the displacement between the magnets. Fig. 4 shows the magnet force varying as a function of magnet size ratio γ with a set of curves corresponding to fixed displacements from 1 to 10 mm.

Figure 4
Fig. 4. Force between two magnets as a function of magnet height–width ratio γ = a/b at a number of fixed displacements from 1 to 10 mm. The positions of maximum force are shown with dots, indicating that magnet size ratio to achieve the maximum force is in the region around γ = 0.4.

For each curve, there is a local maxima in the force; this corresponds to the magnet size ratio that produces the greatest force at that displacement. While the magnet size ratio that produces the greatest forces varies with displacement, the graph shows that the optimum magnet size ratio remains around γ ≈ 0.4.

Therefore, the statement in our previous paper is incorrect, and the magnet thickness should not be made as thin as possible; to maximize the force for a fixed magnet volume, the thickness of the magnets should be minimized to not less than 40% of their width.

While the main conclusions of the original publication are not invalidated by this correction, there is now scope for further analysis of the force behavior between multipole arrays of varying height-to-width (and perhaps height-to-wavelength) aspect ratios.

Footnotes

Corresponding author: W. Robertson (will.robertson@adelaide.edu.au).

References

1. 3D analytical calculation of the forces exerted between two cuboidal magnets

G Akoun, J-P Yonnet

IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. MAG-20, issue (5), pp. 1962–1964, 1984, 10.1109/TMAG.1984.1063554

2. Parameters for optimizing the forces between linear multipole magnet arrays

W Robertson, B Cazzolato, A Zander

IEEE Magn. Lett., Vol. 1, 2010, 10.1109/LMAG.2010.2047716, 0500304

Authors

No Photo Available

Will Robertson

No Bio Available
No Photo Available

Ben Cazzolato

No Bio Available
No Photo Available

Anthony Zander

No Bio Available

Cited By

No Citations Available

Keywords

IEEE Keywords

No Keywords Available

INSPEC: Controlled Indexing

No Keywords Available

More Keywords

No Keywords Available

Corrections

No Corrections

Media

No Content Available

Indexed by Inspec

© Copyright 2011 IEEE – All Rights Reserved