The thirsty traveler visits Gamont: a rejoinder to "Comments on fuzzy sets/spl minus/what are they and why?"

Replying to the comments of W.H. Woodall and R.E. Davis (ibid., p.43) on the author's editorial (ibid., p.1), the authors present two illustrations to show that they do not have a poor opinion of probability but that they believe fuzzy membership to be more useful in some cases.<
>