Home  |   Login  |   Logout  |   Access Information  |   Alerts  |   Purchase History  |   Cart  |   Sitemap  |   Help   
 
Login
BROWSE SEARCH IEEE XPLORE GUIDE SUPPORT
Article Information

Mitigating Amdahlapos;s law through EPI throttling
Annavaram, M.; Grochowski, E.; Shen, J.
Computer Architecture, 2005. ISCA apos;05. Proceedings. 32nd International Symposium on
Volume , Issue , 4-8 June 2005 Page(s): 298 - 309
Digital Object Identifier   10.1109/ISCA.2005.36
Summary: This paper is motivated by three recent trends in computer design. First, chip multi-processors (CMPs) with increasing numbers of CPU cores per chip are becoming common. Second, multi-threaded software that can take advantage of CMPs will soon become prevalent. Due to the nature of the algorithms, these multi-threaded programs inherently will have phases of sequential execution; Amdahl's law dictates that the speedup of such parallel programs will be limited by the sequential portion of the computation. Finally, increasing levels of on-chip integration coupled with a slowing rate of reduction in supply voltage make power consumption a first order design constraint. Given this environment, our goal is to minimize the execution times of multi-threaded programs containing nontrivial parallel and sequential phases, while keeping the CMP's total power consumption within a fixed budget. In order to mitigate the effects of Amdahl's law, in this paper we make a compelling case for varying the amount of energy expended to process instructions according to the amount of available parallelism. Using the equation, Power-Energy per instruction (EPI) * Instructions per second (IPS), we propose that during phases of limited parallelism (low IPS) the chip multi-processor will spend more EPI; similarly, during phases of higher parallelism (high IPS) the chip multi-processor will spend less EPI; in both scenarios power is fixed. We evaluate the performance benefits of an EPI throttle on an asymmetric multiprocessor (AMP) prototyped from a physical 4-way Xeon SMP server. Using a wide range of multi-threaded programs, we show a 38% wall clock speedup on an AMP compared to a standard SMP that uses the same power. We also measure the supply current on a 4-way SMP server while running the multi-threaded programs and use the measured data as input to a software simulator that implements a more flexible EPI throttle. The results from the measurement-driven simulation show performance benefits comparable to the AMP prototype. We analyze the results from both techniques, explain why and when an EPI throttle works well, and conclude with a discussion of the challenges in building practical EPI throttles.

» View citation and abstract

IEEE Members

Log in by entering your IEEE Web Account Username and Password.

IEEE Communications Society members: If you subscribe to the IEEE Electronic Periodicals Package or IEEE Electronic Periodicals Package Plus, you must access your subscription at www.comsoc.org.

Users at Subscribing Institutions

Check with your librarian, information professional, or system manager to determine if you need to log in. Please complete the online Technical Support Form if you need assistance.

Already Purchased This Article?

Select the Purchase History link to access the document. You will have 5 Days after purchase to access the Full Text PDF. Please complete the online Technical Support Form if you need assistance.

Guests

• Search and access Abstract records free of charge
Register for table of contents alerts
• Purchase Full Text PDF documents

» Learn more about subscription options or how to become an IEEE Member.

You are not logged in.
LOGIN
Username
Password
GO
» Forgot your password?
Please remember to log out when you have finished your session.
You must log in to access:
• Advanced or Author Search
• CrossRef Search
• AbstractPlus Records
• Full Text PDF
• Full Text HTML
Access this document
» Buy this document now
» Learn more about
» Learn more about
   purchasing articles
   and standards
Learn more about IEEE Subscriptions
Indexed by IEE Inspec
© Copyright 2009 IEEE – All Rights Reserved