An empirical analysis of equivalence partitioning, boundary valueanalysis and random testing
Reid, S.C.
Software Metrics Symposium, 1997. Proceedings., Fourth International
Volume , Issue , 5-7 Nov 1997 Page(s):64 - 73
Digital Object Identifier   10.1109/METRIC.1997.637166
Summary:An experiment comparing the effectiveness of equivalence partitioning (EP), boundary value analysis (BVA) and random testing was performed, based on an operational avionics system of approximately 20000 lines of Ada code. The paper introduces an experimental methodology that considers all possible input values that satisfy a test technique and all possible input values that would cause a module to fail (rather than arbitrarily chosen values from these sets) to determine absolute values for the effectiveness for each test technique. As expected, an implementation of BVA was found to be most effective, with neither EP nor random testing half as effective. The random testing results were surprising, requiring just 8 test cases per module to equal the effectiveness of EP, although somewhere in the region of 50000 random test cases were required to equal the effectiveness of BVA

» View citation and abstract

Log in by entering your IEEE Web Account Username and Password.

IEEE Communications Society members: If you subscribe to the IEEE Electronic Periodicals Package or IEEE Electronic Periodicals Package Plus, you must access your subscription at www.comsoc.org.

Check with your librarian, information professional, or system manager to determine if you need to log in. Please complete the online Technical Support Form if you need assistance.

Select the Purchase History link to access the document. You will have 5 Days after purchase to access the Full Text PDF. Please complete the online Technical Support Form if you need assistance.

• Search and access Abstract records free of charge
• Register for table of contents alerts
• Purchase Full Text PDF documents

» Learn more about subscription options or how to become an IEEE Member.